https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462618 The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing product registration expenses as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure. The tribunal found the issue was covered by a previous order in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2011-12. The CIT(A)'s reasoning was deemed sound, concluding that product registration expenses were allowable as revenue expenditure. The revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 16:06:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462618 The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing product registration expenses as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure. The tribunal found the issue was covered by a previous order in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2011-12. The CIT(A)'s reasoning was deemed sound, concluding that product registration expenses were allowable as revenue expenditure. The revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462618