<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1577 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462626</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving a statutory authority&#039;s charitable status. The Revenue unsuccessfully argued that the assessee&#039;s activities were commercial in nature, attempting to deny exemption under section 11. The tribunal relied on the SC&#039;s decision in Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which clarified that receipts of statutory bodies are prima facie excluded from commercial receipts. The tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions related to infrastructure development fund, citing judicial consistency with previous years&#039; orders. Additionally, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to depreciation claims was rejected as the statutory amendment had prospective effect only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 19:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1577 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462626</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving a statutory authority&#039;s charitable status. The Revenue unsuccessfully argued that the assessee&#039;s activities were commercial in nature, attempting to deny exemption under section 11. The tribunal relied on the SC&#039;s decision in Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which clarified that receipts of statutory bodies are prima facie excluded from commercial receipts. The tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions related to infrastructure development fund, citing judicial consistency with previous years&#039; orders. Additionally, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to depreciation claims was rejected as the statutory amendment had prospective effect only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>