<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462616</link>
    <description>An income-tax appeal was dismissed in limine for non-prosecution where the assessee failed to appear on the hearing date, did not respond to notice sent by RPAD, did not intimate any change of address, and filed no adjournment request. The Tribunal applied the principle that absence of prosecution indicates lack of interest in pursuing the appeal and relied on prior Tribunal and High Court authority to dismiss the matter without examining the substantive merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 12:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462616</link>
      <description>An income-tax appeal was dismissed in limine for non-prosecution where the assessee failed to appear on the hearing date, did not respond to notice sent by RPAD, did not intimate any change of address, and filed no adjournment request. The Tribunal applied the principle that absence of prosecution indicates lack of interest in pursuing the appeal and relied on prior Tribunal and High Court authority to dismiss the matter without examining the substantive merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>