https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44842 Interference under Article 226 was unwarranted where the challenge was confined to refusal of stay against an appellate order that merely dismissed the Revenue's appeal. No quantified duty demand had been raised against the petitioner, no penalty had been imposed, and the petition did not seek stay of the original adjudication order. In the absence of any executable demand under the impugned order, there was no basis for granting stay or for writ intervention. The writ petition was therefore dismissed. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:53:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44842 Interference under Article 226 was unwarranted where the challenge was confined to refusal of stay against an appellate order that merely dismissed the Revenue's appeal. No quantified duty demand had been raised against the petitioner, no penalty had been imposed, and the petition did not seek stay of the original adjudication order. In the absence of any executable demand under the impugned order, there was no basis for granting stay or for writ intervention. The writ petition was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44842