<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST officer&#039;s tax determination invalid due to improper show cause notice and denial of hearing opportunity under Section 73 and 75</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90134</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 19.12.2023, finding violations of natural justice principles and statutory requirements. The court held that the Proper Officer failed to issue a valid show cause notice under Section 73, as the summary in GST DRC-01 cannot substitute for a proper SCN. The determination of tax and attached order were deemed invalid due to lack of proper authentication by the Proper Officer, creating a regulatory gap requiring digital or e-signature authentication under Rule 26(3). The court found the order contravened Section 75(4) by denying reasonable opportunity of hearing, as the DRC-01 summary left hearing date fields blank and failed to provide personal hearing opportunity despite no reply submission. The petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST officer&#039;s tax determination invalid due to improper show cause notice and denial of hearing opportunity under Section 73 and 75</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90134</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 19.12.2023, finding violations of natural justice principles and statutory requirements. The court held that the Proper Officer failed to issue a valid show cause notice under Section 73, as the summary in GST DRC-01 cannot substitute for a proper SCN. The determination of tax and attached order were deemed invalid due to lack of proper authentication by the Proper Officer, creating a regulatory gap requiring digital or e-signature authentication under Rule 26(3). The court found the order contravened Section 75(4) by denying reasonable opportunity of hearing, as the DRC-01 summary left hearing date fields blank and failed to provide personal hearing opportunity despite no reply submission. The petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>