<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44840</link>
    <description>The impugned High Court orders were set aside because the nature of package tea, whether blending tea amounts to manufacture, and whether a distinction exists between packages weighing 27 kgs. or less and those exceeding that weight required factual determination. The matters were remitted for fresh disposal with directions to record oral and documentary evidence on those questions before deciding the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44840</link>
      <description>The impugned High Court orders were set aside because the nature of package tea, whether blending tea amounts to manufacture, and whether a distinction exists between packages weighing 27 kgs. or less and those exceeding that weight required factual determination. The matters were remitted for fresh disposal with directions to record oral and documentary evidence on those questions before deciding the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>