<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 49 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s order was found unsustainable because it had not considered the material on record relating to the different categories of imports and had not applied the correct valuation framework for imported goods. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh hearing and decision in accordance with the applicable law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 49 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s order was found unsustainable because it had not considered the material on record relating to the different categories of imports and had not applied the correct valuation framework for imported goods. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh hearing and decision in accordance with the applicable law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>