<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Lithium-ion batteries for mobile phone manufacturing qualify for 12% IGST under Serial No. 203, specific end-use provisions override general classification rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90106</link>
    <description>CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries imported for mobile phone manufacturing qualify for IGST at 12% under Serial No. 203 of Schedule II to IGST Rate Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate) from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2020, thereafter 18% following omission of Serial No. 203. The Tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention that batteries should attract higher rates under Serial No. 139 (28%) or Serial No. 376AA (18%) based on classification uncertainty at import stage. Relying on precedents including LG Electronics and Camlin Ltd., CESTAT held that specific end-use provisions override general classification rules. The demand for short-paid customs duty under Section 28(1) of Customs Act, interest under Section 28AA, redemption fine, and penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) were set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Lithium-ion batteries for mobile phone manufacturing qualify for 12% IGST under Serial No. 203, specific end-use provisions override general classification rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90106</link>
      <description>CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries imported for mobile phone manufacturing qualify for IGST at 12% under Serial No. 203 of Schedule II to IGST Rate Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate) from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2020, thereafter 18% following omission of Serial No. 203. The Tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention that batteries should attract higher rates under Serial No. 139 (28%) or Serial No. 376AA (18%) based on classification uncertainty at import stage. Relying on precedents including LG Electronics and Camlin Ltd., CESTAT held that specific end-use provisions override general classification rules. The demand for short-paid customs duty under Section 28(1) of Customs Act, interest under Section 28AA, redemption fine, and penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) were set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>