<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 209 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774141</link>
    <description>At the stage of charge, the court must confine itself to whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and grave suspicion; it cannot weigh defence material or finally decide the genuineness of disputed documents. On that footing, contemporaneous complaints, bank intimation, newspaper notices, witness statements, and handwriting/FSL material were treated as sufficient to require trial, and the discharge order was set aside. The company&#039;s authorised representative was also permitted to continue prosecuting the petition after production of a board resolution, since the request was only to regularise representation already being acted upon in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 209 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774141</link>
      <description>At the stage of charge, the court must confine itself to whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and grave suspicion; it cannot weigh defence material or finally decide the genuineness of disputed documents. On that footing, contemporaneous complaints, bank intimation, newspaper notices, witness statements, and handwriting/FSL material were treated as sufficient to require trial, and the discharge order was set aside. The company&#039;s authorised representative was also permitted to continue prosecuting the petition after production of a board resolution, since the request was only to regularise representation already being acted upon in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>