https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774149 CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification 18/2009-S.T. for transport services related to export goods for four shipping bills where Let Export Order dates fell after transportation dates. However, exemption was denied for one shipping bill where Let Export Order preceded transportation, requiring forfeiture of Rs. 66,437. The tribunal rejected allegations regarding Let Export Order dates being prior to shipping bill dates and accepted revised EXP-2 filing. No penalty was imposed as appellant did not suppress information and agreed to forego the disputed amount. Appeal disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774149 CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification 18/2009-S.T. for transport services related to export goods for four shipping bills where Let Export Order dates fell after transportation dates. However, exemption was denied for one shipping bill where Let Export Order preceded transportation, requiring forfeiture of Rs. 66,437. The tribunal rejected allegations regarding Let Export Order dates being prior to shipping bill dates and accepted revised EXP-2 filing. No penalty was imposed as appellant did not suppress information and agreed to forego the disputed amount. Appeal disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774149