https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774154 A writ petitioner under Article 226 must ordinarily show a personal legal injury or a genuine public interest basis, and a stranger cannot seek such relief merely because criminal proceedings exist. The petitions failed on locus standi because the petitioner was neither directly affected nor properly proceeding as PIL. Court-monitored investigation was also unwarranted, as supervisory interference is confined to rare cases of abuse of power, mala fides, or illegality, and the agency had already investigated, filed complaints, and obtained cognizance. Suppression of earlier proceedings and misrepresentation further undermined maintainability, and the writ petitions were dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 08:38:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774154 A writ petitioner under Article 226 must ordinarily show a personal legal injury or a genuine public interest basis, and a stranger cannot seek such relief merely because criminal proceedings exist. The petitions failed on locus standi because the petitioner was neither directly affected nor properly proceeding as PIL. Court-monitored investigation was also unwarranted, as supervisory interference is confined to rare cases of abuse of power, mala fides, or illegality, and the agency had already investigated, filed complaints, and obtained cognizance. Suppression of earlier proceedings and misrepresentation further undermined maintainability, and the writ petitions were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774154