<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 259 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774191</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition citing enormous delay of 846 days in filing. The Court noted similar matters had already been dismissed and rejected the petition on grounds of both merit and delay. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising two justices, indicating the petition failed to meet procedural requirements and lacked substantive merit for judicial consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 259 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774191</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition citing enormous delay of 846 days in filing. The Court noted similar matters had already been dismissed and rejected the petition on grounds of both merit and delay. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising two justices, indicating the petition failed to meet procedural requirements and lacked substantive merit for judicial consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>