<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44831</link>
    <description>Small scale industrial exemption for job work units under Notification No. 175/86 turns on the real nature of the manufacturing relationship. Mere supply of raw materials by the principal manufacturer does not by itself defeat exemption; the decisive test is whether the job worker is a genuine principal-to-principal manufacturer or only a dummy unit or hired labour. The later trade notice clarified this standard and displaced the earlier approach that treated input supply alone as sufficient to deny relief. On that clarified test, exemption may remain available where the job worker is the actual manufacturer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44831</link>
      <description>Small scale industrial exemption for job work units under Notification No. 175/86 turns on the real nature of the manufacturing relationship. Mere supply of raw materials by the principal manufacturer does not by itself defeat exemption; the decisive test is whether the job worker is a genuine principal-to-principal manufacturer or only a dummy unit or hired labour. The later trade notice clarified this standard and displaced the earlier approach that treated input supply alone as sufficient to deny relief. On that clarified test, exemption may remain available where the job worker is the actual manufacturer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>