https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462601 An appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) CPC against a remand order remains maintainable on its own footing even if the trial court later passes a consequential order after remand. Section 105(2) creates a disability only where the remand order itself is not challenged; it does not bar the remand appeal merely because subsequent proceedings have occurred. The remand order retains independent existence, and any order passed in pursuance of it depends on the validity of the remand. Setting aside the remand would also undo the consequential proceedings, so a separate appeal against the later order is not required. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jul 2025 20:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462601 An appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) CPC against a remand order remains maintainable on its own footing even if the trial court later passes a consequential order after remand. Section 105(2) creates a disability only where the remand order itself is not challenged; it does not bar the remand appeal merely because subsequent proceedings have occurred. The remand order retains independent existence, and any order passed in pursuance of it depends on the validity of the remand. Setting aside the remand would also undo the consequential proceedings, so a separate appeal against the later order is not required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462601