<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 149 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44822</link>
    <description>Where excise assessment proceedings remained provisional for an inordinate period, the High Court directed the competent revenue authority to complete the assessment and pass the final approval order within a fixed time. The court relied on the prolonged pendency as sufficient ground for time-bound relief, while expressly leaving the substantive controversy on the permissibility of provisional assessment under the cited rules undecided. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to finalise the assessment process within two months from production of a certified copy of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 149 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44822</link>
      <description>Where excise assessment proceedings remained provisional for an inordinate period, the High Court directed the competent revenue authority to complete the assessment and pass the final approval order within a fixed time. The court relied on the prolonged pendency as sufficient ground for time-bound relief, while expressly leaving the substantive controversy on the permissibility of provisional assessment under the cited rules undecided. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to finalise the assessment process within two months from production of a certified copy of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>