<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44816</link>
    <description>The court set aside the demand notice issued without following principles of natural justice and fair play, emphasizing the necessity of providing notice and opportunity before taking administrative actions with civil consequences. The court highlighted the uncertainty in alleging violation of conditions and stressed the importance of firm conclusions before demanding excise duty. The petitioner&#039;s contention regarding the violation of statutory provisions was left for re-evaluation. The writ petition was allowed without costs, granting the first respondent the opportunity to proceed lawfully after due notice to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44816</link>
      <description>The court set aside the demand notice issued without following principles of natural justice and fair play, emphasizing the necessity of providing notice and opportunity before taking administrative actions with civil consequences. The court highlighted the uncertainty in alleging violation of conditions and stressed the importance of firm conclusions before demanding excise duty. The petitioner&#039;s contention regarding the violation of statutory provisions was left for re-evaluation. The writ petition was allowed without costs, granting the first respondent the opportunity to proceed lawfully after due notice to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>