<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774094</link>
    <description>Related-party customs valuation requires acceptance of the declared transaction value unless the Department produces cogent evidence that the price is unacceptable. The article states that invoice prices could not be rejected without contemporaneous higher comparable imports or other material showing undervaluation, and that a prior SVB acceptance supported the declared value. It also explains that LME prices are only market indicators and cannot, by themselves, displace transaction value in the absence of evidence of flow back, royalty, technical fees, or any other factor showing that the relationship influenced price. The remand was therefore unsustainable and the declared assessable value stood accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774094</link>
      <description>Related-party customs valuation requires acceptance of the declared transaction value unless the Department produces cogent evidence that the price is unacceptable. The article states that invoice prices could not be rejected without contemporaneous higher comparable imports or other material showing undervaluation, and that a prior SVB acceptance supported the declared value. It also explains that LME prices are only market indicators and cannot, by themselves, displace transaction value in the absence of evidence of flow back, royalty, technical fees, or any other factor showing that the relationship influenced price. The remand was therefore unsustainable and the declared assessable value stood accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>