https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44808 The court ruled that the show cause notice served on the Chairman of the petitioner company was valid, considering him an authorized agent of the company. The court emphasized the importance of proper service for legal actions, rejecting the petitioner's argument that service on the Chairman did not constitute service on the company. The judgment highlighted the company's awareness of the notice and objections raised, focusing on actual receipt of the notice rather than technicalities. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, finding no lack of jurisdiction and imposed costs on the petitioner. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44808 The court ruled that the show cause notice served on the Chairman of the petitioner company was valid, considering him an authorized agent of the company. The court emphasized the importance of proper service for legal actions, rejecting the petitioner's argument that service on the Chairman did not constitute service on the company. The judgment highlighted the company's awareness of the notice and objections raised, focusing on actual receipt of the notice rather than technicalities. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, finding no lack of jurisdiction and imposed costs on the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44808