<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774114</link>
    <description>Bogus purchase additions were examined where the assessee failed to prove delivery of goods through delivery challans, transport evidence, or octroi receipts, and notices to the alleged suppliers either went unserved or drew no response. As the purchases were not satisfactorily linked to corresponding sales, the purchases were treated as suspicious; however, the sales themselves were not rejected, making full disallowance excessive. On these facts, a reasonable estimate of the profit element embedded in the impugned purchases was applied, and the disallowance was restricted to 10% of such purchases rather than the higher addition proposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 08:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774114</link>
      <description>Bogus purchase additions were examined where the assessee failed to prove delivery of goods through delivery challans, transport evidence, or octroi receipts, and notices to the alleged suppliers either went unserved or drew no response. As the purchases were not satisfactorily linked to corresponding sales, the purchases were treated as suspicious; however, the sales themselves were not rejected, making full disallowance excessive. On these facts, a reasonable estimate of the profit element embedded in the impugned purchases was applied, and the disallowance was restricted to 10% of such purchases rather than the higher addition proposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>