<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 189 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774121</link>
    <description>Kerala HC held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 cannot be used for review purposes. The court found that the assessing officer had already considered the relevant aspects during original scrutiny assessment under Section 143, making the reopening merely a review rather than based on proper reasons to believe. Since mere change of opinion cannot justify invoking Section 147, the reopening was impermissible and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 08:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 189 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774121</link>
      <description>Kerala HC held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 cannot be used for review purposes. The court found that the assessing officer had already considered the relevant aspects during original scrutiny assessment under Section 143, making the reopening merely a review rather than based on proper reasons to believe. Since mere change of opinion cannot justify invoking Section 147, the reopening was impermissible and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>