https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774138 The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging cancellation of GST registration under Maharashtra GST Act, 2017. The court found the show cause notice vague and deficient as it merely cited Section 29(2)(e) alleging fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the appointed hearing date or detailing the alleged misconduct. The court held that noticees must be informed of specific allegations to respond effectively. Despite availability of alternative statutory remedies, the court entertained the petition due to gross violation of natural justice principles in the decision-making process. The impugned cancellation order was set aside. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jul 2025 08:34:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774138 The Bombay HC allowed a petition challenging cancellation of GST registration under Maharashtra GST Act, 2017. The court found the show cause notice vague and deficient as it merely cited Section 29(2)(e) alleging fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the appointed hearing date or detailing the alleged misconduct. The court held that noticees must be informed of specific allegations to respond effectively. Despite availability of alternative statutory remedies, the court entertained the petition due to gross violation of natural justice principles in the decision-making process. The impugned cancellation order was set aside. Case-Laws GST Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774138