<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44804</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing the need for equal treatment under the law. It directed the respondents to grant the petitioners the same benefit as another importer received under a specific exemption letter. The Court ordered the petitioners to pay customs duty based on the granted exemption, discharged the Bank Guarantee for any differential duty amount, and allowed the respondents to verify and claim any shortfall. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and the civil appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44804</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing the need for equal treatment under the law. It directed the respondents to grant the petitioners the same benefit as another importer received under a specific exemption letter. The Court ordered the petitioners to pay customs duty based on the granted exemption, discharged the Bank Guarantee for any differential duty amount, and allowed the respondents to verify and claim any shortfall. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and the civil appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>