https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462579 The Madras HC ruled that a writ petition challenging a FEMA show cause notice under Rule 4(3) is generally not maintainable unless issued by an incompetent authority or tainted with malafides. While the petitioner was not supplied four crucial documents, the HC held this did not vitiate the entire proceedings since the Adjudicating Authority could form an opinion based on available materials. The court directed that petitioners be given 30 days to submit explanations regarding all documents, including the four additional ones, after which the Adjudicating Authority must decide whether to proceed with or drop the inquiry. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:10:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462579 The Madras HC ruled that a writ petition challenging a FEMA show cause notice under Rule 4(3) is generally not maintainable unless issued by an incompetent authority or tainted with malafides. While the petitioner was not supplied four crucial documents, the HC held this did not vitiate the entire proceedings since the Adjudicating Authority could form an opinion based on available materials. The court directed that petitioners be given 30 days to submit explanations regarding all documents, including the four additional ones, after which the Adjudicating Authority must decide whether to proceed with or drop the inquiry. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462579