<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1659 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462584</link>
    <description>The note discusses two customs law points: seizure under Section 110(1) of the Customs Act requires the statutory condition precedent of &quot;reason to believe&quot;, and extension of time for issuing a show cause notice under Section 124 cannot be granted without giving the affected person an opportunity of being heard, as that would offend natural justice. It also records that the matters were directed to be listed on 5 May 2025 among the top ten cases for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 19:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1659 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462584</link>
      <description>The note discusses two customs law points: seizure under Section 110(1) of the Customs Act requires the statutory condition precedent of &quot;reason to believe&quot;, and extension of time for issuing a show cause notice under Section 124 cannot be granted without giving the affected person an opportunity of being heard, as that would offend natural justice. It also records that the matters were directed to be listed on 5 May 2025 among the top ten cases for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>