<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44795</link>
    <description>Issuance of a statutory show cause notice during pending writ proceedings was not contemptuous because it was a necessary step in adjudication and confiscation, interim relief had been refused, and the notice itself noted the pending petitions. The exemption notification did not, by itself, entitle the petitioners to clearance and return of the gold, since the authorities had a basis to treat the goods as part of a restricted-import and foreign-exchange contravention scheme involving wider customs and trade law issues. The seizure, investigation, and adjudication were therefore not held illegal or without authority, and the petitions for writ interference were rejected. The passports were to be returned unless prosecution was commenced within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44795</link>
      <description>Issuance of a statutory show cause notice during pending writ proceedings was not contemptuous because it was a necessary step in adjudication and confiscation, interim relief had been refused, and the notice itself noted the pending petitions. The exemption notification did not, by itself, entitle the petitioners to clearance and return of the gold, since the authorities had a basis to treat the goods as part of a restricted-import and foreign-exchange contravention scheme involving wider customs and trade law issues. The seizure, investigation, and adjudication were therefore not held illegal or without authority, and the petitions for writ interference were rejected. The passports were to be returned unless prosecution was commenced within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>