https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44794 Anticipatory bail in a customs prosecution was refused because the Court found a prima facie role supported by material beyond a co-accused's confession. The allegations indicated the petitioner's involvement in arranging travel, tickets, conveyance, and delivery of concealed foreign currency, and the investigation was still at a crucial stage. The Court held that custodial interrogation was necessary for an effective investigation and that discretionary relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not warranted where there was a real risk of interference with the inquiry. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:54:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44794 Anticipatory bail in a customs prosecution was refused because the Court found a prima facie role supported by material beyond a co-accused's confession. The allegations indicated the petitioner's involvement in arranging travel, tickets, conveyance, and delivery of concealed foreign currency, and the investigation was still at a crucial stage. The Court held that custodial interrogation was necessary for an effective investigation and that discretionary relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not warranted where there was a real risk of interference with the inquiry. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44794