<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue appeal dismissed on metal scrap valuation redetermination under Rule 12 Customs Valuation Rules 2007</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90016</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging redetermination of value for imported metal scrap under Rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. The department relied on a Tribunal precedent from Commissioner of Customs, Patparganj vs. Hanuman Prasad &amp; Sons case. However, Delhi HC recently overruled this Tribunal decision in Niraj Silk Mills case, ruling in favor of the importer after examining various Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments on identical valuation issues. CESTAT found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order rejecting value enhancement, upholding the importer&#039;s position on customs valuation determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue appeal dismissed on metal scrap valuation redetermination under Rule 12 Customs Valuation Rules 2007</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90016</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging redetermination of value for imported metal scrap under Rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. The department relied on a Tribunal precedent from Commissioner of Customs, Patparganj vs. Hanuman Prasad &amp; Sons case. However, Delhi HC recently overruled this Tribunal decision in Niraj Silk Mills case, ruling in favor of the importer after examining various Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments on identical valuation issues. CESTAT found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order rejecting value enhancement, upholding the importer&#039;s position on customs valuation determination.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>