https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90009 AT disposed of appeals regarding provisional attachment order under money laundering proceedings where appellant challenged quantification of proceeds of crime beyond specified offence period of May 2009 to August 2010. The tribunal declined to adjudicate on contentious issue of whether proceeds should be calculated based on excess production profits or environmental restoration costs, noting absence of judicial precedent or statutory provision. Appeals disposed of with liberty granted to appellant company to raise all material issues including period limitations and quantification methodology before Special Judge PMLA Court during trial proceedings where prosecution complaint under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA remains pending with charges yet to be framed. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:29 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90009 AT disposed of appeals regarding provisional attachment order under money laundering proceedings where appellant challenged quantification of proceeds of crime beyond specified offence period of May 2009 to August 2010. The tribunal declined to adjudicate on contentious issue of whether proceeds should be calculated based on excess production profits or environmental restoration costs, noting absence of judicial precedent or statutory provision. Appeals disposed of with liberty granted to appellant company to raise all material issues including period limitations and quantification methodology before Special Judge PMLA Court during trial proceedings where prosecution complaint under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA remains pending with charges yet to be framed. Highlights Money Laundering Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:29 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90009