https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773992 A summary appellate remedy under Section 152A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act was treated as confined to the record before the Returning Officer, so fresh documents could not be introduced to convert it into a full evidentiary inquiry; disputes needing proof beyond that record were said to belong to an election petition under Section 91. On prima facie material showing SARFAESI recovery action and a public notice identifying a candidate as a defaulter, supervisory interference under Article 227 was considered justified because the appellate order appeared to ignore relevant material and relied on inapposite authorities. The question whether all validly nominated candidates are necessary parties was left for larger Bench consideration. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773992 A summary appellate remedy under Section 152A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act was treated as confined to the record before the Returning Officer, so fresh documents could not be introduced to convert it into a full evidentiary inquiry; disputes needing proof beyond that record were said to belong to an election petition under Section 91. On prima facie material showing SARFAESI recovery action and a public notice identifying a candidate as a defaulter, supervisory interference under Article 227 was considered justified because the appellate order appeared to ignore relevant material and relied on inapposite authorities. The question whether all validly nominated candidates are necessary parties was left for larger Bench consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773992