https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774012 Pending trial of the predicate offences and the connected PMLA complaint, the Tribunal declined to conclusively decide the challenge to the provisional attachment or the disputed quantification of proceeds of crime. It treated the questions on the period of alleged offence, the basis of computation, and whether excess production or environmental loss and restoration cost should govern as matters better examined in the trial proceedings. The attachment was maintained, but the appellants were left free to seek substitution in accordance with the earlier order, and all contentions were reserved for consideration before the Special Judge. The bank's rights over the mortgaged property were kept unaffected. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774012 Pending trial of the predicate offences and the connected PMLA complaint, the Tribunal declined to conclusively decide the challenge to the provisional attachment or the disputed quantification of proceeds of crime. It treated the questions on the period of alleged offence, the basis of computation, and whether excess production or environmental loss and restoration cost should govern as matters better examined in the trial proceedings. The attachment was maintained, but the appellants were left free to seek substitution in accordance with the earlier order, and all contentions were reserved for consideration before the Special Judge. The bank's rights over the mortgaged property were kept unaffected. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774012