<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 104 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774036</link>
    <description>Section 11 exemption cannot be denied merely because Form 10B was uploaded after the due date if the audit report was available before processing under section 143(1). The filing requirement was treated as directory, not mandatory, so compliance was sufficient where the report existed before the return was processed. The denial of exemption was reversed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 104 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774036</link>
      <description>Section 11 exemption cannot be denied merely because Form 10B was uploaded after the due date if the audit report was available before processing under section 143(1). The filing requirement was treated as directory, not mandatory, so compliance was sufficient where the report existed before the return was processed. The denial of exemption was reversed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>