<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 131 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774063</link>
    <description>Audit proceedings were required to disclose the documents obtained from the enforcement authority before further action on the audit report. The Authority was directed to furnish copies of those documents, and no action was to be taken on the audit report for two weeks after the copies were supplied. The writ petition was disposed of without a final adjudication on the merits of the audit notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 131 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774063</link>
      <description>Audit proceedings were required to disclose the documents obtained from the enforcement authority before further action on the audit report. The Authority was directed to furnish copies of those documents, and no action was to be taken on the audit report for two weeks after the copies were supplied. The writ petition was disposed of without a final adjudication on the merits of the audit notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>