https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774071 HC disposed of petition challenging GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months. Court found violation of natural justice as no personal hearing date was notified. HC directed petitioner to approach authorities within two months for restoration by submitting pending returns and paying tax dues with interest and late fees. If petitioner complies with Rule 22(4) proviso requirements, authorities must expeditiously consider restoration application in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 08:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774071 HC disposed of petition challenging GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months. Court found violation of natural justice as no personal hearing date was notified. HC directed petitioner to approach authorities within two months for restoration by submitting pending returns and paying tax dues with interest and late fees. If petitioner complies with Rule 22(4) proviso requirements, authorities must expeditiously consider restoration application in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774071