<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1580 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462559</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes after CIT(A) passed ex-parte order sustaining additions for unexplained bank credits. Assessee argued inability to appear before CIT(A) due to incarceration prevented engaging legal representation. ITAT restored matter to CIT(A) with direction to grant one final opportunity for assessee to substantiate case without adjournment, failing which CIT(A) may pass appropriate order as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1580 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462559</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes after CIT(A) passed ex-parte order sustaining additions for unexplained bank credits. Assessee argued inability to appear before CIT(A) due to incarceration prevented engaging legal representation. ITAT restored matter to CIT(A) with direction to grant one final opportunity for assessee to substantiate case without adjournment, failing which CIT(A) may pass appropriate order as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>