<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1582 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462560</link>
    <description>Corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise falls within the scope of an international transaction after the statutory amendment to section 92B, and its arm&#039;s length commission may be benchmarked at 0.5% on the facts accepted by the Tribunal. Inter-unit transfer of tea leaves was held not to warrant adjustment where the assessee&#039;s annual weighted average price method was consistent and more reliable than selective monthly averaging. Interest on USD-denominated loans to an associated enterprise required benchmarking by reference to USD LIBOR, and the peak-balance domestic spread approach was rejected; no transfer pricing adjustment was therefore called for. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed on all three issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1582 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462560</link>
      <description>Corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise falls within the scope of an international transaction after the statutory amendment to section 92B, and its arm&#039;s length commission may be benchmarked at 0.5% on the facts accepted by the Tribunal. Inter-unit transfer of tea leaves was held not to warrant adjustment where the assessee&#039;s annual weighted average price method was consistent and more reliable than selective monthly averaging. Interest on USD-denominated loans to an associated enterprise required benchmarking by reference to USD LIBOR, and the peak-balance domestic spread approach was rejected; no transfer pricing adjustment was therefore called for. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed on all three issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>