<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1694 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462561</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding TP adjustment on management fees paid to its AE. The TPO rejected the assessee&#039;s TNMM method and TP study, arguing the assessee hadn&#039;t availed majority of services under the umbrella agreement. The Tribunal held that availing even some services from a composite agreement suffices to prove consideration paid to AEs. The TPO lacks authority to determine benefit derivation from intra-group services - this falls under AO&#039;s jurisdiction. The TPO&#039;s role is restricted to determining if transactions are at arm&#039;s length price. The TPO failed to justify rejecting TNMM method, and the Tribunal found the transaction at ALP. The TDS credit issue was remanded to AO for factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1694 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462561</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding TP adjustment on management fees paid to its AE. The TPO rejected the assessee&#039;s TNMM method and TP study, arguing the assessee hadn&#039;t availed majority of services under the umbrella agreement. The Tribunal held that availing even some services from a composite agreement suffices to prove consideration paid to AEs. The TPO lacks authority to determine benefit derivation from intra-group services - this falls under AO&#039;s jurisdiction. The TPO&#039;s role is restricted to determining if transactions are at arm&#039;s length price. The TPO failed to justify rejecting TNMM method, and the Tribunal found the transaction at ALP. The TDS credit issue was remanded to AO for factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>