https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14727 The court held that where grave, detailed allegations of orchestrating IGST refund fraud exist and the petitioner had opportunities to be heard but did not avail them, the claim of denial of personal hearing is unsubstantiated. Applying the clean hands principle, the court concluded that invoking writ jurisdiction would be inappropriate because it would reward fraudulent conduct and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act within the time granted. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:57 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14727 The court held that where grave, detailed allegations of orchestrating IGST refund fraud exist and the petitioner had opportunities to be heard but did not avail them, the claim of denial of personal hearing is unsubstantiated. Applying the clean hands principle, the court concluded that invoking writ jurisdiction would be inappropriate because it would reward fraudulent conduct and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act within the time granted. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:57 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14727