<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reconstituted Selection Committee can restart GST Tribunal appointment process afresh under Rule 3</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90000</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging the interpretation of Rule 3 of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Appointment and Conditions of Services of President and Members) Rules, 2023. The petitioner contested the reconstituted Search-cum-Selection Committee&#039;s decision to restart the appointment process de novo after some members demitted office. The HC held that Rule 3 does not expressly restrict the reconstituted Committee&#039;s procedures, and the phrase &quot;as it may deem fit&quot; must be construed pragmatically to achieve the statutory objective. The Court found no illegality in the Committee&#039;s decision to scrutinize applications afresh based on Intelligence Bureau inputs, emphasizing that appointments to judicial positions require high integrity and suitability standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reconstituted Selection Committee can restart GST Tribunal appointment process afresh under Rule 3</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90000</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging the interpretation of Rule 3 of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Appointment and Conditions of Services of President and Members) Rules, 2023. The petitioner contested the reconstituted Search-cum-Selection Committee&#039;s decision to restart the appointment process de novo after some members demitted office. The HC held that Rule 3 does not expressly restrict the reconstituted Committee&#039;s procedures, and the phrase &quot;as it may deem fit&quot; must be construed pragmatically to achieve the statutory objective. The Court found no illegality in the Committee&#039;s decision to scrutinize applications afresh based on Intelligence Bureau inputs, emphasizing that appointments to judicial positions require high integrity and suitability standards.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>