<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT restricts section 153C additions, requires year-specific evidence, prevents double taxation on land investments</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89989</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting additions under section 153C search assessments. For unaccounted receipts, ITAT confirmed 20% profit margin on verifiable on-money receipts for AY 2015-16 only, deleting extrapolated additions for subsequent years lacking year-specific incriminating material. The tribunal emphasized that additions in non-abated assessments require incriminating documents relatable to specific assessment years. Regarding unaccounted land investment under section 69, ITAT deleted additions finding payments sourced from already-taxed unaccounted receipts, preventing double taxation. For alleged unaccounted cash expenditure under section 69C, ITAT upheld deletion as seized documents from third-party premises lacked nexus to assessee&#039;s business, with AO failing to establish connection through proper enquiry or corroboration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT restricts section 153C additions, requires year-specific evidence, prevents double taxation on land investments</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89989</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting additions under section 153C search assessments. For unaccounted receipts, ITAT confirmed 20% profit margin on verifiable on-money receipts for AY 2015-16 only, deleting extrapolated additions for subsequent years lacking year-specific incriminating material. The tribunal emphasized that additions in non-abated assessments require incriminating documents relatable to specific assessment years. Regarding unaccounted land investment under section 69, ITAT deleted additions finding payments sourced from already-taxed unaccounted receipts, preventing double taxation. For alleged unaccounted cash expenditure under section 69C, ITAT upheld deletion as seized documents from third-party premises lacked nexus to assessee&#039;s business, with AO failing to establish connection through proper enquiry or corroboration.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>