<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT sets aside customs valuation enhancement due to procedurally flawed surrogate value determination under Rule 9</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89974</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal challenging valuation enhancement of imported remote control devices and transformers. The adjudicating authority rejected the declared value and determined surrogate value under Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, relying on market survey reports and coerced statements. CESTAT held that while rejection under Rule 12 may be valid, surrogate value must derive authenticity from Rules 4-9 applied sequentially. The market survey report lacked credibility as it was not adjusted per Rules 7-8 requirements, cross-examination of surveying officers was denied, and the authority failed to conform with Rule 9&#039;s best judgment provisions. The tribunal found the substitution of surrogate value procedurally flawed despite valid rejection of declared value, setting aside the impugned order completely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT sets aside customs valuation enhancement due to procedurally flawed surrogate value determination under Rule 9</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89974</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal challenging valuation enhancement of imported remote control devices and transformers. The adjudicating authority rejected the declared value and determined surrogate value under Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, relying on market survey reports and coerced statements. CESTAT held that while rejection under Rule 12 may be valid, surrogate value must derive authenticity from Rules 4-9 applied sequentially. The market survey report lacked credibility as it was not adjusted per Rules 7-8 requirements, cross-examination of surveying officers was denied, and the authority failed to conform with Rule 9&#039;s best judgment provisions. The tribunal found the substitution of surrogate value procedurally flawed despite valid rejection of declared value, setting aside the impugned order completely.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:48:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>