<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 23 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773955</link>
    <description>An addition for alleged bogus capital gains, treated as unexplained cash credit, was found unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s return, supporting documents and bank statement did not support the transaction alleged by the revenue. The reassessment and the addition were held to lack cogent evidentiary support, and the first appellate authority had confirmed the addition without proper examination of the material on record. The addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 23 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773955</link>
      <description>An addition for alleged bogus capital gains, treated as unexplained cash credit, was found unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s return, supporting documents and bank statement did not support the transaction alleged by the revenue. The reassessment and the addition were held to lack cogent evidentiary support, and the first appellate authority had confirmed the addition without proper examination of the material on record. The addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>