<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 37 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s cancellation of an assessment order passed under Section 144 read with Section 263. The Tribunal had previously set aside the foundational Section 263 order in an earlier appeal, finding the original assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. Since the Section 263 order was invalid, the consequential assessment order could not survive. The Tribunal held that additions made under Sections 69, 56(2)(vii), and disallowances under Section 14A were properly deleted by CIT(A). The pendency of Revenue&#039;s appeal before HC without stay did not affect the binding nature of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 37 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s cancellation of an assessment order passed under Section 144 read with Section 263. The Tribunal had previously set aside the foundational Section 263 order in an earlier appeal, finding the original assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. Since the Section 263 order was invalid, the consequential assessment order could not survive. The Tribunal held that additions made under Sections 69, 56(2)(vii), and disallowances under Section 14A were properly deleted by CIT(A). The pendency of Revenue&#039;s appeal before HC without stay did not affect the binding nature of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>