<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44749</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing a pre-deposit of excise duty pending appeal. The Court found that the Tribunal failed to consider crucial facts, including a letter from the Chief Commissioner and the petitioner&#039;s initial order being set aside in a review appeal. As a result, the High Court allowed the writ petition, each party bearing its costs, and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal without requiring any deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44749</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing a pre-deposit of excise duty pending appeal. The Court found that the Tribunal failed to consider crucial facts, including a letter from the Chief Commissioner and the petitioner&#039;s initial order being set aside in a review appeal. As a result, the High Court allowed the writ petition, each party bearing its costs, and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal without requiring any deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>