<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44748</link>
    <description>Pending appeal proceedings before the Commissioner (Appeals), together with an unresolved application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay, were treated as sufficient to prevent coercive recovery of the disputed central excise demand. Following earlier Division Bench guidance, the department was not permitted to recover the amount covered by the appealed order until that application was decided. Recovery was therefore restrained in favour of the assessee until disposal of the pending request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44748</link>
      <description>Pending appeal proceedings before the Commissioner (Appeals), together with an unresolved application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay, were treated as sufficient to prevent coercive recovery of the disputed central excise demand. Following earlier Division Bench guidance, the department was not permitted to recover the amount covered by the appealed order until that application was decided. Recovery was therefore restrained in favour of the assessee until disposal of the pending request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>