<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1533 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462546</link>
    <description>Permission to appeal was sought in relation to an order, and the parties represented that Form FA 3 had already been filed by the Interim Resolution Professional before the Adjudicating Authority by way of interlocutory application. On that basis, the implementation of the impugned order was stayed until the interlocutory application is disposed of by the Adjudicating Authority. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1533 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462546</link>
      <description>Permission to appeal was sought in relation to an order, and the parties represented that Form FA 3 had already been filed by the Interim Resolution Professional before the Adjudicating Authority by way of interlocutory application. On that basis, the implementation of the impugned order was stayed until the interlocutory application is disposed of by the Adjudicating Authority. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>