<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1532 - NATIONAL COMPAY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462547</link>
    <description>A composite demerger scheme was approved for procedural progression under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016. The Tribunal noted board approval, supporting valuation and fairness materials, and regulatory observations, then directed convening of the demerging company&#039;s equity shareholders&#039; and unsecured creditors&#039; meetings. It dispensed with the secured creditors&#039; meeting on the basis of full consent, and dispensed with the resulting company&#039;s equity shareholders&#039; meeting because consent was unanimous. It also treated the absence of secured and unsecured creditors in the resulting company as removing the need for creditor meetings, and issued consequential directions on notice, publication, e-voting, chairperson, scrutiniser, quorum and service on statutory authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1532 - NATIONAL COMPAY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462547</link>
      <description>A composite demerger scheme was approved for procedural progression under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016. The Tribunal noted board approval, supporting valuation and fairness materials, and regulatory observations, then directed convening of the demerging company&#039;s equity shareholders&#039; and unsecured creditors&#039; meetings. It dispensed with the secured creditors&#039; meeting on the basis of full consent, and dispensed with the resulting company&#039;s equity shareholders&#039; meeting because consent was unanimous. It also treated the absence of secured and unsecured creditors in the resulting company as removing the need for creditor meetings, and issued consequential directions on notice, publication, e-voting, chairperson, scrutiniser, quorum and service on statutory authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>