<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2040 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773927</link>
    <description>A notice issued for reassessment gave the assessee less than seven days to respond, contrary to the minimum period required. The governing jurisdictional High Court authority was applied to treat the shortened response time as prejudicial and violative of natural justice. On that basis, the notice and the consequential reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s objection succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2040 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773927</link>
      <description>A notice issued for reassessment gave the assessee less than seven days to respond, contrary to the minimum period required. The governing jurisdictional High Court authority was applied to treat the shortened response time as prejudicial and violative of natural justice. On that basis, the notice and the consequential reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s objection succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>