<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 960 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462542</link>
    <description>The ITAT Amritsar allowed the assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 254. The tribunal had earlier enhanced disallowance from Rs. 92,92,170 to Rs. 3,28,67,765 by estimating magazine and journal expenses at 10% of total operating revenue, despite only the assessee filing an appeal against the AO&#039;s original disallowance. The tribunal acknowledged that under Hukumchand Mills Ltd precedent, the word &quot;thereon&quot; in section 33(4) restricts tribunal jurisdiction to the subject matter of appeal, limiting enhancement powers when the department hasn&#039;t appealed. The rectification was granted as the enhancement constituted a mistake apparent from record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 960 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462542</link>
      <description>The ITAT Amritsar allowed the assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 254. The tribunal had earlier enhanced disallowance from Rs. 92,92,170 to Rs. 3,28,67,765 by estimating magazine and journal expenses at 10% of total operating revenue, despite only the assessee filing an appeal against the AO&#039;s original disallowance. The tribunal acknowledged that under Hukumchand Mills Ltd precedent, the word &quot;thereon&quot; in section 33(4) restricts tribunal jurisdiction to the subject matter of appeal, limiting enhancement powers when the department hasn&#039;t appealed. The rectification was granted as the enhancement constituted a mistake apparent from record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>