<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT validly initiated Section 263 revision proceedings for incomplete assessment verification despite pending writ challenges</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89940</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revision proceedings u/s 263 as not entertainable, following precedent in Piyara Lal case. PCIT validly initiated revision after finding AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) without proper verification of asset valuation discrepancies, purchase value differences, and post-demonetization cash deposits requiring examination per SOP guidelines. Court declined merits examination, directing petitioners to pursue statutory remedies by filing objections within four weeks, with subsequent appeal rights to Tribunal if adverse orders passed. Respondents must consider objections on merits and decide notices in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:44:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT validly initiated Section 263 revision proceedings for incomplete assessment verification despite pending writ challenges</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89940</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revision proceedings u/s 263 as not entertainable, following precedent in Piyara Lal case. PCIT validly initiated revision after finding AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) without proper verification of asset valuation discrepancies, purchase value differences, and post-demonetization cash deposits requiring examination per SOP guidelines. Court declined merits examination, directing petitioners to pursue statutory remedies by filing objections within four weeks, with subsequent appeal rights to Tribunal if adverse orders passed. Respondents must consider objections on merits and decide notices in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:44:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>