<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 136 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44730</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, ruling that authorities can impose altered classification rates retrospectively for up to six months before notice under Section 11A, even without allegations of suppression or concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 136 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44730</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, ruling that authorities can impose altered classification rates retrospectively for up to six months before notice under Section 11A, even without allegations of suppression or concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>